[ANN] Moe - a simple database persistency framework and a few other things
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Jul 16 20:15:59 MEST 2009
> The persisted objects must be subclasses of MOEmbeddedObject that is
> one downside.
May be just a trait would be nice since you could plug your layer in
any domain objects.
I was just planning to do a stupid traits to save magritte described
object in XML.
I was planning to do the same with SandStone: turning the root class
in a trait and get free
from framework tyranny.
> Also you cannot recursively embed objects. This kind of thing can be
> insidious so you have to be careful with what you describe as an
> embedded object/collection.
> Moe is only meant to make the db mirror your application data.
> Redundant storage only.
> It's very simple.
> Its *very* simple :)
> 3) Is this project similar to SqueakSave? http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/hirschfeld/projects/sqsave/index.html
> No way. That looks pretty awesome, though. I have to check it out..
> ps: if you have to user another database instead of postgres, you
> know there is SqueakDBX ;)
> BTW it could use a few more tests :)
More information about the smallwiki