[ANN] Moe - a simple database persistency framework and a few other things

[stéphane ducasse]

> Disadvantages:
> The persisted objects must be subclasses of MOEmbeddedObject that is  
> one downside.

John why?
May be just a trait would be nice since you could plug your layer in  
any domain objects.
I was just planning to do a stupid traits to save magritte described  
object in XML.
I was planning to do the same with SandStone: turning the root class  
in a trait and get free
from framework tyranny.

> Also you cannot recursively embed objects. This kind of thing can be  
> insidious so you have to be careful with what you describe as an  
> embedded object/collection.
> Moe is only meant to make the db mirror your application data.  
> Redundant storage only.
> It's very simple.
>
> Advantages:
> Its *very* simple :)
>
>
> 3) Is this project similar to SqueakSave? http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/hirschfeld/projects/sqsave/index.html
>
> No way. That looks pretty awesome, though. I have to check it out..
>
> ps: if you have to user another database instead of postgres, you  
> know there is SqueakDBX  ;)
>
> BTW it could use a few more tests :)