About running Wiki on VWNC
Thomas Bernitt
thom-ber at gmx.net
Mon Aug 23 09:15:25 MEST 2004
Hi
I was on vacation the last weeks and now I tried to find a more concrete
answer and I want to add another yes-no-question:
-If a company wants to run VW on a server for internal use, and want to
develope additional smallwiki-functionality, do I need to pay or not?
We had talks on the cebit this year with cincom to put this question to them
- and the answer we got was 'yes, you have to pay'. In this case we has to
pay a developer license at great expense.
This topic demands a conclusion!
Thanks
Thomas
> Hi james
>
> > Hmm, isn't that a contradiction:
> >
> > "If a company wants to run VW on a server for internal use, then they
> > would need a license. "
> >
> > and
> >
> > "So, if you put SmallWiki under an Open Source license, you would also
> > be ok on usage."
> >
> > Let's try simple yes/no questions ;-)
> >
> > - If I run Smallwiki on our company server for internal use, do I need
> > to pay or not?
> >
> > - If I run Smallwiki on our company server for internal and external
> > use as the wiki for an OpenSource project, do I need to pay or not?
> >
> > - If I run Smallwiki on our company server for internal and external
> > use as the wiki for a commercial project, do I need to pay or not?
> >
> > I hate these kind of questions too and I appreciate your effort in
> > trying to answer them!
>
> I want to know too because we are developing software which is
> open-source and can be used by companies and I think that the position
> of cincom should be clear for all of us.
>
> You wrote: "It really depends. I explicitly open sourced BottomFeeder,
> and I'm not making money off it. So, if you put SmallWiki under an
> Open Source license, you would also be ok on usage. It would be
> unsupported by Cincom, but I suspect that's not really an issue here."
>
> SmallWiki is open source but I do not understand what is unsupported
> here?
>
> Thanks
>
More information about the SmallWiki
mailing list