[Moose-dev] Re: FAME new changes broke moose

[Tudor Girba]

I know it is compatible, but I think Pharo would like all code to be  
under MIT.

Cheers,
Doru


On 11 Nov 2009, at 15:30, Adrian Kuhn wrote:

> WTFPL is fully compatible with MIT and whatever else lawyers might  
> come up with  ... as should be obvious from WTF's very name :)
>
> --AA
>
> On Nov 11, 2009, at 15:11 , Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Thanks. Of course, an MIT would have been probably more  
>> straightforward especially for the integration in Pharo, but I  
>> guess it should do for now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>>
>> On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:57, Adrian Kuhn wrote:
>>
>>> Fixed, picked the WTFPL license.
>>>
>>> --AA
>>>
>>> On Nov 10, 2009, at 23:10 , Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like the latest versions of Fame depend on PhExample.  
>>>> Unfortunately, PhExample is not released under a MIT/BSD- 
>>>> compatible license.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a mistake somewhere, or should Moose go with a fork of  
>>>> Fame?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Doru
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10 Nov 2009, at 22:43, stephane ducasse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Apparently changes in Fame broke moose.
>>>>>
>>>>> processCompiledMethod: aMethod
>>>>> 	| pragma prop |
>>>>>>>> 	aMethod should be isCompiledMethod.
>>>>> 	pragma := Pragma
>>>>> 		inMethod: aMethod
>>>>>
>>>>> So what do we do?
>>>>>
>>>>> Stef
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>>>> Moose-dev at iam.unibe.ch
>>>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>>
>>>> "Next time you see your life passing by, say 'hi' and get to know  
>>>> her."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>
>> "In a world where everything is moving ever faster,
>> one might have better chances to win by moving slower."
>>
>>
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Yesterday is a fact.
  Tomorrow is a possibility.
  Today is a challenge."