[Moose-dev] Re: famix renamings

[Stéphane Ducasse]

On 28 juin 07, at 11:52, Martin Pinzger wrote:

> Hi,
> Here is our FAMIX core model for representing Java source code.
> http://seal.ifi.unizh.ch/wiki/swiki/show/FamixCore
>
> There are some differences in naming that can be easily fixed, such
> as we use "parent" instead of "belongsTo". The other main difference
> concerns modifiers of entities. We use an integer to represent the
> scope, static, abstract, etc. modifier of classes, methods, and
> attributes instead of having extra attributes.

Indeed this would be an idea. Do you have a way to say that a value  
is unknown
For example I want to say that a method is a getter but I could also  
want to say that it is
not known that it is a getter that is different from it is not a getter.

> Furthermore, we added
> an abstract "Conext" class to indicate container entities (i.e.,
> entities that can contain other famix entities).
>
> Feel free to use and comment.
>
> --Martin.
>
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> At FAMOOSr you mentioned that you performed renamings on FAMIX?
>>
>> Could you summarize them?
>>
>> The current names of the elements can be found in the UML diagram:
>> http://smallwiki.unibe.ch/moose/famixmetamodel/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>>
>> --
>> www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
>> www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
>>
>> "Every thing should have the right to be different."
>>
>
> Dr. Martin Pinzger
> University of Zurich, Department of Informatics
> http://seal.ifi.uzh.ch/pinzger
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev at iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev